Polygamy
Perhaps the aspect of Islam in respect of women
which is most prominent in the Western mind is that of polygamy. Firstly let me clarify
that Islam does not impose polygamy as a universal practice. The Prophet himself was a
monogamist for the greater part of his married life, from the age of twenty-five when he
married Khadija until he was fifty when she died.
One should therefore regard monogamy as the norm and
polygamy as the exception.
One may observe that, although it has been abused in
some times and some places, polygamy has under certain circumstances a valuable function.
In some situations it may be considered as the lesser of two evils, and in other
situations it may even be positively beneficial arrangement.
The most obvious example of this occurs in times of
war when there are inevitably large numbers of widows and girls whose fiancées and
husbands have been killed in the fighting. One has only to recall the figures of the dead
in the first and second world wars to be aware that literally millions of women and girls
lost their husbands and fiancées and were left alone without any income or care or
protection for themselves or their children. If it is still maintained that under these
circumstances a man may marry only one wife, what options are left to the millions of
other women who have no hope of getting a husband? Their choice, bluntly stated , is
between a chaste and childless old maidenhood, or becoming somebody's mistress, that is an
unofficial second wife with no legal rights for herself or for her children. Most women
would not welcome either of these since most women have always wanted and still do want
the security of a legal husband and family.
The compromise therefore is for women under these
circumstances to face that if given the alternative many of them would rather share a
husband than have none at all. And there is no doubt that it is easier to share a husband
when it is an established and publicly recognized practice than when it is carried on
secretly along with attempts to deceive the first wife.
And it is no secret that polygamy of a sort is
widely carried on in Europe and America. The difference is that while the Western man has
no legal obligations to his second, third or fourth mistresses and their children, the
Muslim husband has complete legal obligations towards his second, third or fourth wife and
their children.
There may be other circumstances unrelated to
war--individual circumstances, where marriage to more than one wife may be preferable to
other available alternatives--for example where the first wife is chronically sick or
disabled. There are of course some husbands who can manage this situation, but no one
would deny its potential hazards. A second marriage in some cases could be a solution
acceptable to all three parties.
Again there are cases in which a wife is unable to
have children, while the husband very much wants them. Under Western laws a man must
either accept his wife's childlessness if he can, or if he cannot he must find a means of
divorce in order to marry again. This could be avoided in some cases if the parties agreed
on a second marriage.
There are other cases where a marriage has not been
very successful and the husband loves another woman. This situation is so familiar that it
is known as the Eternal Triangle, Under Western laws the husband cannot marry the second
woman without divorcing the first one. But the first wife may not wish to be divorced. She
may no longer love her husband, but she may still respect him and wish to stay with him
for the security of marriage, for herself and their children. Similarly the second woman
may not wish to break up the man's first family. There are certain cases such as this
where both women could accept a polygamous marriage rather than face divorce on the one
hand or an extra-marital affair on the other.
I have mentioned some of these examples because to
the majority of Westerners polygamy is only thought of in the context of a harem of
glamorous young girls, not as a possible solution to some of the problems of Western
society itself. I have given some time to it not in order to advocate its indiscriminate
use, but in an attempt to show that it is a practice not to be condemned without thinking
of its uses and possible benefits in any community.